Mid-term results of total elbow arthroplasties in the treatment of geriatric distal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: While double plate fixation is the gold standard treatment for distal humerus fractures in the general population, it is the source of many complications in the elderly. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been proposed as an alternative treatment, with satisfactory short-term functional outcomes. However, little is known about the longevity of the implant and the mid- and long-term complications of this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 TEAs were performed in 57 patients with comminuted distal humerus fractures between September 2008 and September 2019. All patients were clinically (ranges of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS] and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH] functional scores) and radiographically assessed. The minimum follow-up was 2years, and the mean follow-up was 4.7years. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 20.7%, with ulnar nerve damage, complex regional pain syndrome, and severe stiffness being the main complications. The mean MEPS was 85.3, and the mean QuickDASH was 28.1. The mean flexion was 122°, and the mean extension was -23.5°. There were no prosthetic revisions. Of these patients, 17% had radiolucent lines, and 13% had bushing wear at the last follow-up. DISCUSSION: TEA is an effective technique for treating comminuted distal humerus fractures in the geriatric population. The prosthesis's mid-term survivorship was highly satisfactory, with a complication rate that remained low and was generally lower than that of osteosynthesis, with identical functional outcomes. TEAs are indicated in elderly patients, for whom maintaining the fullest possible autonomy is paramount. Our findings suggest that TEAs have sufficient longevity to guarantee a functional, pain-free elbow with no need for reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case series.

Infraspinatus function impairment after arthroscopic Bankart repair with Hill Sachs remplissage. Isokinetic, functional, and radiographic analysis.

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with Hill Sachs remplissage (BHSR) is an option for anterior shoulder instability with humeral defect. Our hypothesis was that infraspinatus capsulo-tenodesis is an effective solution, with good clinical results and no consequences on shoulder strength and ranges of motion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study involving 22 patients operated with arthroscopic BHSR. We compared isokinetic evaluation of both shoulders using a dynanometer in concentric, eccentric force and endurance. Ranges of motion were measured using a goniometer and compared to the contralateral unaffected side. Functional assessment included Constant, Rowe, Walch and Duplay and WOSI scores. Healing and fatty degeneration were analyzed with magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: At mean 37.2 months follow-up, 21 patients (95.4%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention. Range of motion in external rotation of the affected side decreased by 10.8° in adduction and 6° at 90° of abduction (p<0.05). Deficit in external rotation strength of the affected side greater than 15% was found in all isokinetic tests (p<0.05). Walch and Duplay, Rowe, WOSI and adjusted Constant average scores were respectively 71.05±14.1 (40-90), 67.63±19.7 (15-100), 34.6%±19.9 (8.43-76.23) and 69.8±13.57 (36.7-101). Postoperative MRI showed good capsulo-tenodesis healing without infraspinatus muscle fatty degeneration. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic BHSR provides satisfactory functional outcomes but significant infraspinatus functional impairments in both strength and ranges of motion in external rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Massive traumatic articular bone loss of the capitulum humeri treated by costal osteochondral autograft reconstruction: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Articular traumatic bone loss is a severe condition with heterogeneous outcomes, often necessitating complex technical solutions and posing challenges in managing both bone and cartilage loss. Thus, some surgeons have used a technique of osteochondral autograft using a rib to fix an articular bone loss to manage both of these tissue losses. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 25-years-old patient, who had a complex open elbow injury. He presented an association of a terrible triad of the elbow injury with an open traumatic bone loss of the capitulum humeri and unfixable lesion of the lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow. We initially managed these lesions with an external fixator for 2 months followed by a reconstruction of the capitulum humeri using a costal osteochondral autograft. Unfortunately, the patient was lost to follow-up after the 1 month post-operative consultation but he had some encouraging results. DISCUSSION: In this case report, we describe our technique using an osteochondral autograft to address complex bone and cartilaginous losses, thereby expanding the treatment options available to trauma surgeons. CONCLUSION: This case report shows that a reconstruction of the capitellum humeri for a traumatic bone loss with an osteochondral autograft using the eighth rib can be easily performed. More generally, this technique could even help to manage complex traumatic substance loss of both bone and cartilage in other locations.

Bicondylar tibial plateau fracture osteosynthesis with double-plate fixation: Similar complication rates and clinical results but improved radiographic outcomes with dual compared to single approach.

INTRODUCTION: Associating posteromedial and anterolateral approaches should improve fracture line visualization and optimize bicondylar tibial plateau fracture reduction compared to a single midline approach. The present study aimed to compare postoperative complications rates and functional and radiographic results after double-plate fixation via either a single or a dual approach. The study hypothesis was that double-plate fixation using a dual approach provides equivalent complications rates with improved radiographic results compared to a single approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective 2-center study compared bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated by double-plate fixation on a single versus a dual approach between January 2016 and December 2020. Comparison focused on major complications requiring surgical revision, radiographic measurements of medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA); change from their respective baseline values of 87° and 83° (deltaMPTA and deltaPPTA), and functional results on KOOS, SF12 and EQ5D-3L self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 2 of the 20 single approach group patients (10%) [1 surgical site infection (SSI) (5%), and 1 skin complication (5%)], and in 3 of the 39 dual approach group patients (7.69%) (p=0.763), at an average 29 months' follow-up. In the sagittal plane, deltaPPTA was significantly lower with dual than single approach (respectively, 4.67° versus 7.43°; p=0.0104). There were no significant intergroup differences in deltaMPTA or functional results at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests an absence of significant difference in major complications, between single and dual approach for double-plate osteosynthesis of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Using a dual approach enabled improved anatomic restoration in the sagittal plane, without significant differences observed in the frontal plane or functional scores at an average 29months' follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Scapular fractures osteosynthesis via Judet's posterior approach: clinical and radiographic results.

PURPOSE: Scapular fractures are uncommon and mainly treated nonoperatively. Judet's posterior approach allows access to the fracture site through the infraspinatus fossa and may be a technical option when ORIF is decided. The aims of this study were to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scapular body and/or glenoid fractures fixation via Judet's posterior approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study, and all patients admitted for scapular fracture who underwent osteosynthesis via Judet's approach between January 2014 and September 2021 were included. At a minimum follow-up of one year, clinical outcomes were analyzed through subjective shoulder value (SSV) and Constant-Murley score (CMS). Strength in external rotation was measured in adduction and in 90° abduction and compared to healthy side. Radiographic analysis evaluated postoperative fracture reduction on CT scan and glenohumeral osteoarthritis according to Samilson's classification at last follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included with a mean follow-up of 44.9 months. Mean SSV, CMS, and adjusted CMS were 73.8% ± 21.0, 65.8 points ± 19.5, and 72.8% ± 20.8, respectively. Strength in external rotation in adduction of the affected shoulder showed significant impairment when compared with the contralateral side (respectively 7.79 kg ± 4.29 and 12.0 kg ± 3.84, p = 0.02). All fractures healed uneventfully, but five patients (23.8%) required early revision surgery for intra-articular screws in three. Intra-articular gap measure decreased from 3.75 mm ± 1.93 in preoperative to 0.59 mm ± 0.97 after ORIF. The rate of arthritis was 15% at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent scapular fracture osteosynthesis via Judet's posterior approach exhibited satisfactory but incomplete recovery of the affected shoulder as evidenced by functional scores and external rotation strength measurements at a mean follow-up of 44.9 months. Because of the risk of intra-articular screws, postoperative CT scan is mandatory.

Staged BiCompartmental Knee Arthroplasty has Greater Functional Improvement, but Equivalent Midterm Survivorship, as Revision TKA for Progressive Osteoarthritis After Partial Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Progressive arthritis in the unresurfaced compartments of the knee is one failure mode after partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). While progressive arthritis after PKA is typically treated with revision to TKA (rTKA), staged bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (sBiKA) -the addition of another PKA - is an alternative. This study compared outcomes of sBiKA and rTKA for progressive arthritis after PKA. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of non-consecutive cases at four institutions were performed in patients with an intact PKA, without loosening or wear, who underwent sBiKA (n = 27) or rTKA (n = 30), for progressive osteoarthritis. Outcomes studied were new Knee Society Function and Objective Scores (KSSF, KSSO), KOOS, Jr., ROM, operative times, length of stay, complication rates and the need for reoperations. RESULTS: Mean time to conversion was 7.4 ± 6 years for sBiKA and 9.7 ± 8 for rTKA, P = .178. Patient demographics and pre-operative outcomes were similar among cohorts. At an average of 5.7 ± 3 (sBiKA) and 3.2 ± 2 years (rTKA), KOOS, Jr. significantly improved, P < .001, by an equivalent amount. Post-operative KSSO and KSSF were significantly higher in the sBiKA cohort, respectively, (90.4 ± 10 vs 72.1 ± 20, P < .001) and (80.3 ± 18 vs 67.1 ± 19, P = .011). sBiKA patients had significantly greater improvement in KSSO (30.7 ± 33 vs 5.2 ± 18, P = .003). One sBiKA patient underwent reoperation for continued pain. CONCLUSION: SBiKA has equivalent survivorship, but greater improvement in functional outcomes as rTKA at short to midterm follow-up. Given the shorter operative times and length of stay, sBiKA is a safe and cost-effective alternative to rTKA for progressive osteoarthritis following PKA. Nevertheless, further follow-up is necessary to determine whether sBiKA is a durable option.

Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Component in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Clinical, Radiological, and Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a procedure with low morbidity and fast recovery. Anatomic implants or robotic-assisted UKA has been proposed to improve outcomes with precise positioning. Femoral component position (FCP) relative to the tibial insert could be a factor influencing the contact stresses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FCP relative to the tibial insert on clinical outcomes and stress distribution after medial UKA. METHODS: Sixty-two medial fixed-bearing UKAs were evaluated at a minimum two-year follow-up using the Knee Society Score. Postoperative radiological evaluation performed on frontal X-rays classified the FCP relative to the tibial insert into the following: group M (medial), group C (central), and group L (lateral). A finite element model was developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the FCP relative to the tibial component. RESULTS: The postoperative radiological evaluation showed 9 cases in group M, 46 cases in group C, and 7 cases in group L. The maximum knee flexion angle and the 2-year postoperative "symptom" and "patient satisfaction" scores of the Knee Society Score were significantly higher in group C. Compared with central positioning, a shift along the mediolateral axis leads to a displacement of the contact pressure center. CONCLUSION: The FCP relative to the tibial insert may increase patient outcomes at a minimum follow-up of two years after fixed-bearing medial UKA. Accordance between FCP and contact stresses on the polyethylene insert could be a contributing factor of long-term survival of UKA.